On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > > > > > I do think map() and filter() should issue a warning under -3 when the > > > first arg is None. (Or does 2to3 detect this now?) > > > > What's wrong with filter(None, seq)? That currently works in 3k: > > > > >>> filter(None, range(5)) > > <itertools.ifilter object at 0x2b5be60da450> > > >>> [x for x in _] > > [1, 2, 3, 4] > > But that's a bug -- it's been spec'ed that this will stop working. > (Can't remember where, perhaps PEP 3100?) I looked in 3100 and didn't see it. > > (Side note, shouldn't we change the names for filter/map?) > > Huh? What? Why? The function name returned by repr: itertools.ifilter. n
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4