A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-February/077101.html below:

[Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunk

[Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunk [Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunkRobert Brewer fumanchu at aminus.org
Fri Feb 22 18:45:58 CET 2008
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I thought the whole point of 3.0 was a recognition that all that
> doubling-up was a bad thing and to be rid of it.  Why make the
> situation worse?  ISTM that we need two versions of oct() like
> we need a hole in the head.  Heck, there's potentially a case to be
> made that we don't need oct() at all.  IIRC, unix permissions like
> 0666 were the only use case that surfaced.

Postgres bytea coercion is a frequent use case for oct() in my world.
But I agree we don't need two versions.


Robert Brewer
fumanchu at aminus.org

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4