A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-February/077058.html below:

[Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker

[Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug TrackerBrett Cannon brett at python.org
Thu Feb 21 22:21:50 CET 2008
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>  > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Virgil Dupras <hsoft at hardcoded.net> wrote:
>  >> On 2/21/08, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>  >>  >  - no selection -        118
>  >>  >  wont fix        189
>  >>  >  works for me    62
>  >>  >  accepted        310
>  >>  >  fixed   611
>  >>  >  duplicate       75
>  >>  >  later   17
>  >>  >  invalid 73
>  >>  >  postponed       6
>  >>  >  out of date     193
>  >>  >  remind  1
>  >>  >  rejected        180
>  >>
>  >>  Thanks for running it. The rate is better than I expected, so I was
>  >>  wrong in my assumption.
>  >>
>  >>  What would be the difference between accepted and fixed for a closed ticket?
>  >
>  > I don't know what others do, but I use accepted for a patch submission
>  > and fixed for a bug report.
>  >
>  That sounds eminently sensible. So sensible there should be
>  documentation that tells us to do that. Drat it, where's Brett Cannon
>  when you need him? :-)

Trying to get his sprint intro talk lined up for PyCon while dealing
with the stdlib reorg. =)

-Brett
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4