Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Virgil Dupras <hsoft at hardcoded.net> wrote: >> On 2/21/08, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> > - no selection - 118 >> > wont fix 189 >> > works for me 62 >> > accepted 310 >> > fixed 611 >> > duplicate 75 >> > later 17 >> > invalid 73 >> > postponed 6 >> > out of date 193 >> > remind 1 >> > rejected 180 >> >> Thanks for running it. The rate is better than I expected, so I was >> wrong in my assumption. >> >> What would be the difference between accepted and fixed for a closed ticket? > > I don't know what others do, but I use accepted for a patch submission > and fixed for a bug report. > That sounds eminently sensible. So sensible there should be documentation that tells us to do that. Drat it, where's Brett Cannon when you need him? :-) regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4