Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> It must have changed since I last looked at a feature request on the >> tracker - using a type rather than keyword is fine by me. > > I'm fairly certain the rfe type was there ever since the switchover > (at least that's what subversion says: the rfe type was added along > with all other types in r52825, on 2006-11-23). Perhaps we had duplication between the type and the keyword then? It's also possible I'm just misremembering and actually thinking of a completely different bug tracker that had nothing to do with Python. It's a bit of a moot point now anyway. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4