On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > What's wrong with the rfe type? Why does it have to be a keyword? > > For one it's the name. Personally I didn't know the meaning of RFE until > I googled it. > I agree, the name is a bit confusing when you're not used to it. Also I find that, by definition, RFE and feature requests are not exactly the same. There's a thin line between a new feature and an enhancement that is supposed to fill a gap/improve things. Should they really be treated the same way ? Quentin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20080220/0bf54a31/attachment.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4