RetroSearch Browse

Mon Feb 18 19:21:32 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-February/076946.html

-On [20080218 13:38], Virgil Dupras (hsoft at hardcoded.net) wrote:
>Personally, I think that a bug tracker is a good place to keep RFE,
>not a PEP. I think that the PEP would tend to be cluttered with RFE
>nobody cares about forever. So the clutter can never be cleaned unless
>someone takes the responsibility to mercilessly remove them.

A bug tracker is a much better way of registering such information. It also
can be easier referenced in the future since even though when it is closed,
the debate and other stuff will remain in the tracker's tickets for
posterity. :)

PEP: -1
tracker: +1

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/
But Time, keeps flowing like a river (on and on)...

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-February/076946.html below:

[Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker