Martin v. Löwis wrote: > You mean, as the digits? You would have to rewrite the entire long > datatype, which is a tedious exercise. Plus, I believe you would have > to make some operations 64-bit on all systems: when you multiply > digits today, the product will be 32-bit. If you extend the digits, > you might get 64-bit results, which will be slow on 32-bit systems > (plus some 32-bit systems don't support a 64-bit integer type at all > in their compilers). I pass! :) It may be worth a try for Python 4.0 when most OS are 64bit. Christian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4