Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le dimanche 28 décembre 2008 à 16:26 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit : >> If we're going to end up with two functions anyway, why mess with the >> one which is already there and in use for real programs? > > Well, agreed. > I was just hoping we could get away with "fixing" the existing function > and voilà :) I'm all for breaking backwards compatibility when it allows some genuine improvements that would otherwise be impossible, but in this particular case a little API bloat seems like the least of the available evils :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4