A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/084586.html below:

[Python-Dev] suggest change to "Failed to find the necessary bits to build these modules" message

[Python-Dev] suggest change to "Failed to find the necessary bits to build these modules" messageMike Coleman tutufan at gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 19:22:42 CET 2008
Done: http://bugs.python.org/issue4731


On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 09:59, Mike Coleman <tutufan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was thrown by the "Failed to find the necessary bits to build these
>> modules" message at the end of newer Python builds, and thought that
>> this indicated that the Python executable itself was not built.
>> That's arguably stupidity on my part, but I wonder if others will not
>> trip on this, too.
>>
>> Would it be possible to change this wording slightly, to something like
>>
>>    Python built, but failed to find the necessary bits to build these modules
>>
>> ?
>
> Sounds reasonable to me. Can you file a bug report at bugs.python.org,
> Mike, so this doesn't get lost?
>
> -Brett
>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4