Nick Coghlan writes: > 3. Do what a number of standard library APIs (e.g. linecache) that > accept filenames do and also accept an optional "module globals" > argument. Actually, I did this and committed a change (to pydb) before posting any of these queries. ;-) If "a number of standard library APIs" are doing the *same* thing, then shouldn't this exposed as a common routine? If on the other hand, by "a number" you mean "one" as in linecache -- 1 *is* a number too! -- then perhaps the relevant code that is buried inside the "updatecache" should be exposed on its own. (As a side benefit that code can be tested separately too!) Should I file a feature request for this?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4