A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/084406.html below:

why not remove thread support instead?

[Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead? [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Dec 17 23:52:36 CET 2008
Nick Coghlan wrote:

> Actually, I believe 3.0 already took a big step towards allowing this by
> changing the way modules are initialised.

It's a step, but I wouldn't call it a big one. There are
many other problems to be solved before fully independent
interpreters are possible.

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4