A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/084300.html below:

why not remove thread support instead?

[Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead? [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?Thomas Heller theller at ctypes.org
Fri Dec 12 18:32:07 CET 2008
Christian Heimes schrieb:
> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>> Actually, I believe 3.0 already took a big step towards allowing this by
>> changing the way modules are initialised.
> 
> You are believing correctly. Martin has designed and implemented a
> nicely working API to store extension module data per interpreter state.
>  For now interpreter states are used for sub interpreters only.
> 
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3121/

But the extension modules still have to changed to use this mechanism, right?
-- 
Thanks,
Thomas

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4