Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/084295.html below:

why not remove thread support instead?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> Actually, I believe 3.0 already took a big step towards allowing this by
> changing the way modules are initialised.

You are believing correctly. Martin has designed and implemented a
nicely working API to store extension module data per interpreter state.
 For now interpreter states are used for sub interpreters only.

http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3121/

Christian

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4