A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/084224.html below:

[Python-Dev] Merging flow

[Python-Dev] Merging flow [Python-Dev] Merging flowJeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gmail.com
Thu Dec 11 01:12:02 CET 2008
Was there ever a conclusion to this? I need to merge the patches
associated with issue 4597 from trunk to all the maintenance branches,
and I'd like to avoid messing anyone up if possible. If I don't hear
back, I'll plan to svnmerge directly from trunk to each of the
branches, and then block my merge to py3k from being merged again to
release30-maint.

Thanks,
Jeffrey

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote:
> Several people have asked about the patch and merge flow. Now that Python
> 3.0 is out it's a bit more complicated.
>
> Flow diagram
> ------------
>
> trunk ---> release26-maint
>       \->      py3k       ---> release30-maint
>
>
> Patches for all versions of Python should land in the trunk. They are then
> merged into release26-maint and py3k branches. Changes for Python 3.0 are
> merged via the py3k branch.
>
> Christian
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4