RetroSearch Browse

Thu Aug 28 14:27:02 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-August/082067.html

2008/8/28 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>:

> bots we should "trust" to judge the health of the trees.  I don't think the
> current list needs to be set in stone, and in fact several of the "stable"
> bots have had simple svn or other non-tree related problems for a while.

Maybe a good requisite to move a buildbot from unstable to stable is
to find a champion for it. I mean, something that can test on that
platform and cares enough about it to, or fix the issue
himself/herself, or find who broke it and bother the responsible until
it gets fixed.

Regards,

-- 
. Facundo

Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-August/082067.html below:

[Python-Dev] Stable / unstable buildbots