Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:30 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > >> http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.1.0/ >> "Unicode 5.1.0 contains over 100,000 characters, and provides >> significant additions and improvements..." to existing features, >> including new files and upgrades to existing files. Sounds close to >> adding features ;-) > > I agree. This seriously feels like new, potentially high risk code to > be adding this late in the game. The BDFL can always override, but > unless someone is really convincing that this is low risk high benefit, > I'd vote no for 2.6/3.0. But it's [the] wafer-thin [end of the wedge] ... The difficulties with subprocess suggest there's plenty to do without adding yet one more tiny little task. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4