A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-August/081966.html below:

[Python-Dev] what version of bsddb to use/accept for 2.6/3.0

[Python-Dev] what version of bsddb to use/accept for 2.6/3.0Neal Norwitz nnorwitz at gmail.com
Mon Aug 25 03:15:06 CEST 2008
Many buildbots are running bsddb 4.7, particularly the debian/ubuntu
ones (4.7.25 which seems to be the latest).  Some of them are
crashing, others are not.  The max version we support in both 2.6 and
3.0 is 4.7.  Should we allow this version or should we use a lower
maximum that is more likely to work (ie, not crash)?

It looks like the WIndows buildbots use 4.4.20.  Unfortunately, the
Windows bots aren't in great shape either.

Additionally, there are reference leaks in both 2.6 and 3.0:
  test_bsddb3 leaked [80, 80] references, sum=160 (2.6)
  test_bsddb3 leaked [63, 63] references, sum=126 (3.0)

It would be nice to get as many of these things fixed up before
release.  Jesus, Greg, Trent, can you make some time over the next
week to stabilize bsddb support?

Thanks,
n
PS.  To change the max version of bsddb supported in Unix, modify
max_db_ver in setup.py.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4