A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-August/081881.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Pydotorg] Should we help pythonmac.org?

[Python-Dev] [Pydotorg] Should we help pythonmac.org?Leonardo Santagada santagada at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 06:54:15 CEST 2008
-1 to use mac ports python as the base python

On 18/08/2008, at 22:18, Bill Janssen wrote:

>>
>> The official Mac Python should be an OS X application, with an icon,
>> living in /Applications, ideally with a Mac-standard editor app  (the
>> 2.5.1 I have has IDLE), etc.
>
> No, probably not.  Frankly, I think the official Mac Python should be
> (and is) /usr/bin/python, the version that Apple ships with the
> system.  I always try to make my stuff work with that Python, instead
> of installing a different version, which in my experience usually
> leads to grief somewhere down the road.


I don't think this way, the official python should be the one from  
python.org, as it is on windows or there will be no point to make  
python 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 (or any point release that is not incorporated  
in vendors builds).

The only grief I ever had in using the python from python.org is that  
I have to compile PyObjC from source, but this can be easily fixed.

Talking about this, why not just point pythonmac.org to python.org  
python version and release the packages as eggs on cheeseshop?  
(specially py2exe and pyobjc as those are usually heavily needed on  
macs).

--
Leonardo Santagada



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4