On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > skip at pobox.com wrote: >> The import statement seems to work from an interactive shell (I have a >> module named test in the same directory as the main prog, hence the >> problem), but even if it does work should we be importing stuff from the >> test package in non-test code? > > I saw those checkins go by on the checkins list - they have to do with > silencing -3 warnings for modules that the stdlib still uses in Python > 2.6 for backwards compatibility reasons (but switching to the relevant > new approaches in 3.0, thus making the warnings a false alarm). > Nick is right and all of those checkins were mine. > test.test_support.catch_warning is a convenient way to suppress a > warning for a small piece of code and then revert the state of the > warnings module back to the way it was afterwards. > Yep. > Those imports should probably be guarded with sys.py3kwarn though, with > a standard import being used if the command line flag isn't set. That's probably a good idea. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4