On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Antoine Pitrou wrote: [...] > nose itself is not a completely independent piece of work but "a discovery-based > unittest extension" (although a very big extension!). For that reason, Michael > Foord's suggestion to gradually modernize and improve the stdlib unittest sounds > reasonable to me: it allows to be more focussed, keep backwards compatibility, > and also to decide and implement changes piecewise - avoiding the blank sheet > effect where people all push for wild ideas and radically new concepts (tm). +1 (speaking as somebody who has worked on nose a bit) John
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4