On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 22:20 +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote: > Last time I looked at it, the C API wasn't nailed down yet. That's why > I passed over it entirely for my tutorial. The only advice I was able > to give was that if your extension is just a wrapper around existing C > code, you might be better off rewriting it using ctypes. Given that ctypes doesn't work on a number of popular architectures, including x86_64 (the last time I looked), I'd hardly call that "better off". :-(
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4