On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:05:57 -0400, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Sebastian Rittau wrote: >>[I just saw the other post about unit testing, while I was writing this. >>A strange conincidence.] > >Indeed. I've played around (again) recently with both nose and py.test, so >I'd like to make a meta comment. > >I would really like to see some of the people who are interested in Python >unit testing to get together and work on an updated testing framework that >incorporates the best ideas from all the existing frameworks. I'd like to >see good integration with setuptools, both for running the tests and for >packaging. I'd like to see good doctest support, with the ability to hook >in setups and teardowns. I'd like to see some of useful things like layers >taken from zope.testing. > >This doesn't belong on python-dev, and probably not on python-ideas either, >but I'd be willing to start a testing SIG on python.org if others are >interested in getting together for this purpose. The goal should be to >produce something like a unittest-ng, distribute it via the Cheeseshop, and >gather consensus around it for possible inclusion in Python 2.7/3.1. A SIG might be a good idea. There's also already the "testing in python" list, too: http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python A lot of this discussion would be appropriate there. Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4