A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-August/081738.html below:

[Python-Dev] Merges from 2.6 to 3.0?

[Python-Dev] Merges from 2.6 to 3.0? [Python-Dev] Merges from 2.6 to 3.0?Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Sat Aug 9 20:48:15 CEST 2008
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 9:37 AM,  <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
>
>    Guido> However if you think your change requires any kind of manual help
>    Guido> to be merged, it's better to do the merge yourself for just that
>    Guido> revision: svnmerge.py merge -rNNNNN. That way it'll be recorded
>    Guido> as merged and a later big merge will skip it.
>
> Looks like there's a bit of manual work to do (replacing "try/finally" with
> "with", for example).  I don't know what svnmerge.py is though and don't see
> it in my svn tools or my trunk sandbox:
>

As always, the dev FAQ has the answer you are looking for:
http://python.org/dev/faq/#how-do-i-merge-between-branches .
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4