> Looks like there's a bit of manual work to do (replacing "try/finally" with > "with", for example). Why that? Shouldn't the 2.6 code already use the with statement? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4