RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 9 18:37:59 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-August/081733.html

    Guido> However if you think your change requires any kind of manual help
    Guido> to be merged, it's better to do the merge yourself for just that
    Guido> revision: svnmerge.py merge -rNNNNN. That way it'll be recorded
    Guido> as merged and a later big merge will skip it.

Looks like there's a bit of manual work to do (replacing "try/finally" with
"with", for example).  I don't know what svnmerge.py is though and don't see
it in my svn tools or my trunk sandbox:

    ~% cd ~/src/python/trunk/
    trunk% find . -name svnmerge.py
    trunk% like svn
    /usr/bin/svn
    /usr/bin/svnadmin
    /usr/bin/svndumpfilter
    /usr/bin/svnlook
    /usr/bin/svnserve
    /usr/bin/svnsync
    /usr/bin/svnversion

Skip

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-August/081733.html below:

[Python-Dev] Merges from 2.6 to 3.0?