> This whole discussion circles too much, I think. Maybe it should be pepped? The issue isn't circular. It's been patched and tested, then a whole lot of people agreed including Guido. Then you and Bill wanted the bytes functionality back. So I wrote that in there too, and Bill at least said that was sufficient. On Thu, Jul 31, 2008, Bill Janssen wrote: > > But: OK, OK, I yield. Though I still think this is a bad idea, I'll shut > up if we can also add "unquote_as_bytes" which returns a byte sequence > instead of a string. I'll just change my code to use that. > We've reached, to quote Guido, "as close as consensus as we can get on this issue". There is a bug in Python. I've proposed a working fix, and nobody else has. Guido okayed it. I made all the changes the community suggested. What more needs to be discussed here? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20080806/5cfa27a4/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4