On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Leo Soto M. <leo.soto at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> Given that in Python 3.0 __cmp__ is going away, I'm not sure how much >> it all matters -- but if you care, as long as it's supported at all, >> you might as well strive for the most compatibility with 2.5... > > Sure, it won't be a problem on Jython 3.0. But I'm doing this for the > upcoming Jython 2.5, where we still have to live with __cmp__ Which is why I recommend the closest possible compatibility. :-) > -- > Leo Soto M. > http://blog.leosoto.com > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4