After the most recent flurry of discussion I've lost track of what's the right thing to do. I also believe it was said it should wait until 2.7/3.0, so there's no hurry (in fact there's no way to check it -- we don't have branches for those versions yet). On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Matt Giuca <matt.giuca at gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone had time to look at the patch for this issue? It got a lot of > support about a week ago, but nobody has replied since then, and the patch > still hasn't been assigned to anybody or given a priority. > > I hope I've complied with all the patch submission procedures. Please let me > know if there is anything I can do to speed this along. > > Also I'd be interested in hearing anyone's opinion on the "quote_from_bytes" > issue as raised in the previous email. I posted a suggested implementation > of a more restrictive quote_from_bytes in that email, but I haven't included > it in the patch yet. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4