Stavros Korokithakis wrote:
> Hello,
> is concatenation of adjacent strings a useful feature? So far the only
> use case I've seen is causing me endless hours of debugging when I
> forget the comma in a tuple of strings, like so:
>
> ("first",
> "second"
> "third")
>
> Which then becomes a tuple of two items, instead of three. It would
> have been much better if it produced an error. Is there any good
> reason that this feature exists, or would it be better if it were
> removed?
It can be a very useful feature.
See the rejected PEP 3126 for a discussion:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3126/
Michael Foord
>
> Regards,
> Stavros Korokithakis
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
http://www.trypython.org/
http://www.ironpython.info/
http://www.theotherdelia.co.uk/
http://www.resolverhacks.net/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4