A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078905.html below:

[Python-Dev] Do we still need BaseAddress in .vcproj files?

[Python-Dev] Do we still need BaseAddress in .vcproj files? [Python-Dev] Do we still need BaseAddress in .vcproj files?Christian Heimes lists at cheimes.de
Fri Apr 25 22:16:11 CEST 2008
Trent Nelson schrieb:
> I just did this locally to all my .vcproj files for .pyds:
> 
> -  BaseAddress="0x1e000000"
> +  RandomizedBaseAddress="2"
> 
> This was partly out of curiosity, and partly because it was quicker doing that than finding a new unique base address to use for a new module I added to my local tree.  Rebuilt everything and ran a full regression test, and everything passed.  What am I missing?  Do we have parts of Python that rely on finding modules at explicit base addresses?  Is BaseAddress a relic from the past?  Christian or Martin?


An explicit base address speeds up the loading of shared extension
modules a bit. Checkout PC/dllbase_nt.txt

Christian
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4