Trent Nelson schrieb: > I just did this locally to all my .vcproj files for .pyds: > > - BaseAddress="0x1e000000" > + RandomizedBaseAddress="2" > > This was partly out of curiosity, and partly because it was quicker doing that than finding a new unique base address to use for a new module I added to my local tree. Rebuilt everything and ran a full regression test, and everything passed. What am I missing? Do we have parts of Python that rely on finding modules at explicit base addresses? Is BaseAddress a relic from the past? Christian or Martin? An explicit base address speeds up the loading of shared extension modules a bit. Checkout PC/dllbase_nt.txt Christian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4