A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078761.html below:

[Python-Dev] unscriptable?

[Python-Dev] unscriptable? [Python-Dev] unscriptable?Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Apr 20 01:03:17 CEST 2008
Steven writes:
 > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:13:19 +1000
 > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
 > 
 > > Being indexable is subtly different from being subscriptable - the 
 > > former has stronger connotations of numeric indices and sequence-like 
 > > behaviour 

 > With my maths background, I would expect that subscripts are (almost)
 > always numeric, e.g. x-subscript-i means the i-th x value, where i 
 > is a natural number.

I don't think you can get general agreement on which tend to connote
numerical indicies more.  On the other hand, in many contexts "index"
is a general concept, while "subscript" is a typographical convention
for representing an index.

+1 on indexable
+0.5 on subscriptable
-0.1 on scriptable
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4