Steven writes: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:13:19 +1000 > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Being indexable is subtly different from being subscriptable - the > > former has stronger connotations of numeric indices and sequence-like > > behaviour > With my maths background, I would expect that subscripts are (almost) > always numeric, e.g. x-subscript-i means the i-th x value, where i > is a natural number. I don't think you can get general agreement on which tend to connote numerical indicies more. On the other hand, in many contexts "index" is a general concept, while "subscript" is a typographical convention for representing an index. +1 on indexable +0.5 on subscriptable -0.1 on scriptable
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4