On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:13:19 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Being indexable is subtly different from being subscriptable - the > former has stronger connotations of numeric indices and sequence-like > behaviour I dispute this. Indices aren't necessarily numeric (think of an A-Z file), and I don't believe you are correct about the connotations of indexable being numeric or sequence-like. Think of index cards. With my maths background, I would expect that subscripts are (almost) always numeric, e.g. x-subscript-i means the i-th x value, where i is a natural number. +0 on keeping unsubscriptable. +1 on changing it to unidexable. -1 on keeping the current misspelling. -- Steven D'Aprano
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4