Terry Reedy wrote: > "Michael Foord" <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote in message > news:480765B5.2010904 at voidspace.org.uk... > | I think that there is still work I can do on the docs even before any > | grand renaming... > > In a related thread, I proposed and Guido approved that the 2.6/3.0 docs > be changed to > 1. specify that the Fail... names will disappear in the future > 2. list the preferred Assert names first for each pair > 3. use the preferred Assert names and only those names in the explanatory > text and examples. > > Have you or are you going to make these changes or should I open a separate > tracker issue? > > Yep - these were the doc changes I mentioned. I haven't started them but will unless someone beats me to it. :-) Michael > Terry > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4