Jesse Noller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Michael Foord > <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > >> Guido van Rossum wrote: >> > I'm worried that a mass renaming would do anything but inconvenience >> > users during the already stressful 2->3 transition. >> > >> > I'm more in favor of the original proposal of reducing the redundancy post-3.0. >> > >> > >> >> So nix the PEP-8'ifying until after 3.0. >> >> So new methods should follow the current naming scheme (assertIn, >> assertNotIn etc). >> >> [snip...] >> >> > > +1 on your changes Michael - I really like the decorator idea. Let me > know if you want help on adding the new stuff or updating the > documentation. What about aiming this at 2.6 instead of 3.0? > > -jesse > As they will just be new features rather than API changes I would like to add these to 2.6 - although I think May 10th may be after the last alpha? Michael
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4