RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 17 18:11:32 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078710.html

Christian Heimes wrote:
> Michael Foord schrieb:
>   
>> By etc I assume you mean:
>>
>>     assertLessThan
>>     assertGreaterThan
>>     assertLessThanOrEquals
>>     assertGreaterThanOrEquals
>>
>> Would not variants be useful as well - it seems not as the not of one is 
>> always another... (I think 'assertLessThan' reads better than 
>> 'assertLess' but will do what I'm told...)
>>     
>
> Most of the etc. could be simplified with a function assertOp which
> takes an operator as first argument
>
> import operator
> def assertOp(self, op, a, b, msg):
>     func = getattr(operator, op)
>     self.assert_(func(a, b) ...)
>
> assertOp("gt", a, b) == assert a > g
>
>   

Which choice would be up to consensus.

I'm agnostic on this one.

> I also like to have some assert for is, type, isinstance, issubclass and
> contains.
>
>   
is and contains ('in') I listed. type, isinstance, issubclass would be 
extra.

Michael

> Christian
>   

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078710.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposed unittest changes