> I think it would be useful for the tracker to grow a "NeedsReview" > keyword. I realize the "patch" keyword does some of this, but it may > just represent some initial or trivial work. "NeedsReview" should > represent a mature patch that some senior dev needs to look hard at > and make the choice. Not sure what problem that would solve. Over time, I would expect that any open patch also grows the "NeedsReview" keyword, making the keyword pointless. If somebody specifically should review a certain proposed change, the change should be assigned to that person. If someone in a group should review, they should be contacted by email. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4