A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078559.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 2.6a2 execution times with various compilers

[Python-Dev] Python 2.6a2 execution times with various compilers [Python-Dev] Python 2.6a2 execution times with various compilersJeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmodai at in-nomine.org
Fri Apr 11 17:10:24 CEST 2008
I did some performance comparisons with various compilers and the resulting
Python 2.6a2 and pybench.

I put the details on
http://www.in-nomine.org/2008/04/11/python-26a2-execution-times-with-various-compilers/

Of course, take benchmark results with a grain of salt, but it seems ICC can
provide people with an added performance edge when using Python. In short: I
measured a speedup between ~21%-29% with ICC compared to GCC.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/
I was searching through the Heavens and somehow I slipped...
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4