On 9/28/07, Thomas Heller <theller at ctypes.org> wrote: > > Thomas Wouters schrieb: > >> > If you re-eally need to check something into the trunk that re-eally > >> > must not be merged into py3k, but you're afraid it's not going to be > >> > obvious to the merger, please record the change as 'merged' using > >> > "svnmerge merge -M -r<revision>". Please take care when picking the > >> > revision ;) You can also just email me or someone else you see doing > >> > merges, as I doubt this will be a common occurance. > > I think that the 'svnmerge block -r<revision>' command should be used. Or > not? If you're comfortable with using svnmerge yourself, sure. If you're worried that you might mess up the state of the branch, you can leave it up to us (me.) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070929/7ea5fdb3/attachment.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4