RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 26 16:27:50 CEST 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-September/074730.html

I fully support removing all historic references from the 3.0 language
manual. Please do help out! You can just start putting patches ("svn
diff") into bugs.python.org; typically Georg gets to these very
quickly. Do use subversion, not the distributed tarbal (which was out
of date by the time it was uploaded to python.org. :-).

--Guido

On 9/26/07, scav at blueyonder.co.uk <scav at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> I'd like to help out cleaning up the Python3.0 documentation.  There are a
> lot of little leftovers from 2.x that are no longer true. (mentions of
> long, callable() etc.)
>
> Ideally (especially in the tutorial), we should only refer to 3.0 features
> and syntax, and keep the special cases and "other ways to do it" to a
> minimum.
>
> Before I dive in and start submitting patches, what does everyone else
> think?  How much reference to previous python versions should be left in?
> Does it make sense to keep notes of the nature of "since version 2.3 ..."
> when there is an intentional discontinuity at 3.0?
>
> Peter Harris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-September/074730.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0a documentation