Seems a fine idea. I don't have the time for a code review but I'll leave that up to you all. --Guido On 9/17/07, Facundo Batista <facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everybody! > > In the Tracker Issue... > > http://bugs.python.org/issue1772851 > > ... Mark Dickinson came with a patch that alters in a very corner case > how the hash is calculated to a long integer. > > This allows changes in Decimal that lead to a better hashing behaviour > for big, big, really big numbers. > > The patch applies cleanly, all the tests pass ok (Mark also provided > more tests for the hash function). > > I won't commit this right now; I'll delay the change for a couple of > days in case somebody wants to take a look at it. > > Thanks! > > -- > . Facundo > > Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ > PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4