Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Now we are getting into details: you do NOT have to lock > an object to modify its reference count. An atomic > increment/decrement operation is enough. I stand corrected. But if it were as simple as that, I think it would have been done by now. I got the impression that this had already been tried, and it was still too slow. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4