RetroSearch Browse

Sun Sep 9 05:05:23 CEST 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-September/074510.html

Might expected skips instead be based on your current configuration
instead of what someone statically decided what would be appropriate
for your platform?  Every new release I have to go through the
'unexpected skips' to determine that they're perfectly fine for how I
configured python.

It seems that we ought to provide a mechanism for querying python for
how the build was configured (although for non-unittest cases, failing
to import some modules is usually sufficient information - knowing why
they fail probably doesn't matter)

On 9/8/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> >> I can't seem to run the regression tests in a --without-threads build.
> >> Might be interesting to configure a buildbot this way to keep
> >> ourselves honest.
> >
> > Because regrtest.py was importing test_socket_ssl without catching the
> > ImportError exception:
>
> If that is the reason you cannot run it, then it seems it works just
> fine. There is nothing wrong with tests getting skipped.
>
> > So, is this an "expected skip" or not?
>
> No. IIUC, "expected skips" are a platform property. For your platform,
> support for threads is expected (whatever your platform is as log as
> it was built in this millenium).
>
> Regards,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/nick.bastin%40gmail.com
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-September/074510.html below:

[Python-Dev] testing in a Python --without-threads build