> Then I should file a bug/feature request for Roundup. Please consider what you are asking for. How precisely should roundup set the In-reply-to header? It won't know what message this is a reply to, or whether it is a reply at all. > How are others keeping track? Whenever I open an issue after analyzing the email > message, I find that it salready discussed and state is changed, I > had missed the further emails on the same issue due to non-threads. My email tool has better threading than yours, I guess. IceDove (Thunderbird) will thread the messages by subject also. The non-threaded ones get displayed on the second level, appearing in reply to the original message (or, rather, the youngest message with the same subject - just as if the message mentioned in In-Reply-To has already been deleted). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4