On 10/2/07, Facundo Batista <facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2007/10/2, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com>: > > > Yes! We have guaranteed that spec updates are to be treated as bug > fixes and backported. This is especially important in this case > > because other errors have been fixed and the test cases have grown. > > Perfect! I'll backport it to 2.5... what about 2.4? There's one potential breakage that I see here: the Decimal.__pow__ function has different semantics in the new version of Decimal (nonintegers are now allowed as exponents; some previous restrictions on argument sizes no longer exist), so backporting the new version of __pow__ might cause difficulties. In particular, some cases of three-argument pow that previously worked (giving arguably nonsensical results) will now raise an exception. To be honest, I'd be quite surprised to find that *anyone* was using the three-argument pow, but perhaps we should be careful here? Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20071002/57339aa9/attachment.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4