2007/11/24, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: > Did you change the Decimal repr to use the same format for the mantissa? I don't understand the question. The output of repr() does not show this internals... > Could you also check the performance gain against the telco benchmark > which is in the sandbox? [1] I tested different versions of Decimal with this telco.py. With Python from the trunk (r58550), which is the last decimal.py version previous to this change: 1241.8 After changed it to keep _int as string: 869.3 (30% faster!) But still there're a lot of room for improvements. I just commited other patch from Mark, where he reordered __new__, to minimize isinstance() checks for the most used types.} After new reordering patch: 672.9 (22% faster!) :) Regards, -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4