On Nov 28, 2007 10:11 PM, Ron Adam <rrr at ronadam.com> wrote:
> Keeping __root__ relatively short has the benefit of being able to easily
> use "__root__.name" in the case where "name" was/is used in the local
> scope. I don't see any reason to make it harder. There might even be a
> use case for using all explicit __root__ references.
Isn't this an explicit non-goal? We're talking about __builtins__,
the implementation hack, not __builtin__ the module-like object you're
supposed to use if you want to do things like __builtin__.open.
STeVe
--
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4