A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-November/075414.html below:

removing the new and types modules

[Python-Dev] [python] Re: removing the new and types modules [Python-Dev] [python] Re: removing the new and types modulesMichael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Wed Nov 28 23:39:35 CET 2007
henning.vonbargen at arcor.de wrote:
> Sorry if this is a dumb question, but are there actually good reasons to remove "types"?
> IMHO the types module helps keeping code readable. 
> For example
> "if type(obj) == FloatType"
> is just more readable than
> "if type(obj) == type(1.0)".
>   

if isinstance(obj, float)

or

if type(obj) is float

I often use FunctionType though.So long as it moves rather than vanishes...

Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord

> Luckily Python does not distinguish float and double like other languages 
>  - otherwise it wouldn't be clear for the average programmer if 1.0 is a
>  float or a double constant.
>
> Henning
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>
>   

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4