Christian Heimes schrieb: > Adam Olsen wrote: >> -1 on __python__. It seems to be an abbreviation of "python >> interpreter core" or the like, but on its own it implies nothing about >> what it means. >> >> Contrast that with __root__ where we all know what a root is, even >> though it doesn't imply what kind of root it is or how its used. > > I don't like __python__ either. It doesn't explain the meaning of the > variable at all. If you want to stick to something like __python__ I > suggest __pythoncore__ or __pythonroot__, maybe __pythongastric__ (just > kidding). __guts__ ? Really, __python__ has not much self-explanatory potential. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4