On Nov 28, 2007 11:02 AM, Facundo Batista <facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/11/28, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>: > > > ATM I'm torn between __root__ and __python__. > > __root__ gives me the idea of the base of a tree, its primary node. +0 Which it is, if you consider nested namespaces as a tree (all modules are children of __root__, all unnested function locals are children of their module's globals, nested functions are children of their containing function's locals). > __python__ gives me the idea of something very deep inside python. +1 But it violates the (never before uttered, but nevertheless existing in my consciousness since day one) rule that we shouldn't start calling things inside Python "Python things" because then *everything* becomes a Python thingie. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4